Archive for October, 2003

Passive Diffusion Devices & Polyethylene Diffusion Bag (PDB) Samplers

Sunday, October 26th, 2003

Passive Diffusion SamplingPassive Diffusion Samplers are generating a lot of interest in the environmental community for four main reasons:

•Water samples are more representative of the area adjacent to the well screen or area of interest than those taken by other conventional means.
•Well purging is not required.
•They are simple to deploy.
•They are inexpensive when compared to other sampling techniques.

The principle behind passive diffusion is that compounds will migrate or diffuse through a semi-permeable membrane until a concentration equilibrium is established on either side of the membrane. The following three passive devices are currently commercially available or will be soon.

Polyethylene Diffusion Bag (PDB) Samplers

Columbia Analytical is a licensed manufacturer and supplier of the polyethylene diffusion samplers used to collect groundwater samples for long term monitoring of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Most common halogenated and aromatic VOCs-of-concern readily diffuse through polyethylene film and equilibrate in as little as 24 hours. To insure equilibration, 14 days is the recommended minimum deployment period.

Columbia Analytical’s PDB Samplers are made of thin low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film seamed along the sides to prevent abrasion. They are available in diameters that accommodate most monitoring wells (¾” to 4”) and in lengths needed to supply the volume of sample (200-300ml) for analysis of VOCs and the attendant QA/QC. Lengths of 24 inches or less are routinely ordered for the common two inch diameter well to assure strata specific sampling within a well screen. Other lengths and widths are available. Hanging assemblies may be customized for each well based on the client’s placement specifications. Wells that exhibit stratification can be monitored easily and cost effectively by deploying PDB Samplers in tandem (see figure at right).

The most commonly supplied PDB Samplers come field-ready, i.e., filled in the laboratory with certified analyte-free water, sealed and ready for deployment. Alternately, Columbia Analytical can supply field-filled samplers that are similar in design to the field-ready but have a cap for filling and pouring.

Validation of PDB Sampler

Since the introduction of the samplers in 1998, they have undergone hundreds of side-by-side comparisons with traditional purge procedures. Through the multi-state/multi-federal agency and industrial organization the Interstate Technical Regulatory Council (ITRC) Diffusion Sampler Team, many position papers, technical documents, and studies have been collected and produced concerning applicability of PDB Samplers technology at a wide variety of sites. This organization has stated that samples taken through the use of PDB Samplers are as representative as those taken by other conventional sampling techniques. However, certain VOCs, semivolatiles and inorganic analytes cannot be sampled by PDB Samplers because of limited diffusion or non-diffusion across the polyethylene membrane. We recommend including your regulatory agency when reviewing the suitability of this sampling technology for your site.

Cost Comparisons

It has been estimated that use of PDB Samplers can decrease your field deployment costs by 60 - 70% over traditional purge and bail or low-flow techniques. A recent cost comparison for McClellan AFB showed a savings of 67% of field and labor costs over conventional purge samples and an almost identical cost savings over micropurge technology. The ITRC website (www.itrcweb.org) has a cost comparison model that will allow you to estimate your potential cost savings.

Passive Vapor Diffusion (PVD) Samplers

Columbia Analytical provides passive diffusion samplers for the collection of air (vapor) samples in the pore water of sediment. These PVD Samplers consist of an empty, uncapped, glass vial enclosed in two layers of LDPE film. When samplers are placed in sediments, concentration equilibrium is reached between VOCs in the pore water and the air in the vial in one to three weeks, depending on the analyte. The concentration of the VOCs in the pore water can be determined from the analysis of the air sample. The relative concentration partitioning into the air and water varies among VOCs, thus the PVD Samplers are designed to be used primarily as screening tools.

Nylon-Screen PDB Sampler

The use of PDB and PVD Samplers is confined to collection of air and water samples for the analysis of VOCs, due to the poor diffusion rates of other contaminants across the polyethylene membrane. However, Columbia Analytical is participating in studies to develop samplers suitable for the collection of groundwater samples for analyses of inorganic, semivolatile and the poorly diffusing VOC analytes. The availability of passive sampling devices for these analytes is becoming critical as more monitoring of natural attenuation occurs at contaminated sites where the treatment of choice is the augmentation of the natural biochemical activity in the soil.

Diffusion samplers using nylon screens have been used to obtain solute concentrations in wells and in pore water for several years. Don Vroblesky, of the USGS, started research in 2002 for AFCEE and NFESC on simplification of nylon screen samplers to obtain larger sample volumes and to examine their applicability for some emergent contaminants. Columbia Analytical is participating in these studies and in January of 2003 began laboratory studies on a limited suite of inorganics, semivolatiles and VOCs (Benzene, TCE, Perchlorates, 1,4-Dioxane, Arsenic, Iron, Chloride and MTBE) to determine if these contaminants diffuse sufficiently across a nylon-screen and, if so, how long before equilibrium is established. Don Vroblesky reported the results as favorable to the ITRC Diffusion Team in March and August of this year. Additional studies are under way to determine the optimum design of a sampler suitable for field trials.

Learn more about passive diffusion sampling…

Selective Ion Monitoring (SIM) for Low Level Applications in Vapor Samples

Friday, October 3rd, 2003

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is the method of choice for the identification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in vapor samples (e.g. EPA methods TO-14A and TO-15). As various state and federal agencies more frequently require facilities to address risk-based concentrations, such as the low level preliminary remediation goals (PRGs), they find that the standard method is not able to reach the ultra-low levels needed. To address these requirements, CAS’ Simi Valley, California lab has developed a method using selective ion monitoring (SIM) to measure the compounds. SIM is a sensitivity enhancement technique, where the mass spectrometer is programmed to scan for only those ions that are pertinent to the compounds of interest (2-3 mass ions scanned per compound) while ignoring non-essential ions. The mass spectrometer becomes a highly sensitive compound-specific detector.

The driving force for the lower limits has been health risk assessment activities in the indoor and ambient air arena. The exposure criteria for many compounds are being re-evaluated constantly. A recent symposium sponsored by the Groundwater Resources Association (GRA) on subsurface vapor intrusion to indoor air has recommended that the SIM analytical technique be used. For example, trichloroethene (TCE) will have a reporting limit of 1.0 mg/m3 (0.19 ppbv) using the standard full scan method. In contrast, the reporting limit of 0.05 mg/m3 (0.0093 ppbv) for TCE will be achieved with the SIM technique. This meets or exceeds most risk-based concentration criteria. Lower limits are occasionally requested and are reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

These applications typically require a 6-liter evacuated summa canister equipped with low volume flow controller to collect time-integrated VOC samples. To minimize contamination and ensure against false positive results, it is important that canisters and flow controllers be individually certified down to the reporting limits. For less demanding projects, where full scan reporting limits are adequate, batch certification (one per ten) of canisters is acceptable.

Using GC/MS in the SIM mode is a valuable tool for investigating situations where ultra-low level reporting limits are desired. Compound lists and reporting limits are constantly being reviewed and revised.