<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GC/MS-Full Scan vs GC/MS-SIM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caslab.com/News/gcms-full-scan-vs-cgms-sim.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caslab.com/News/gcms-full-scan-vs-cgms-sim.html</link>
	<description>Science, chemistry and environmental news from laboratory experts</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Columbia Analytical</title>
		<link>http://www.caslab.com/News/gcms-full-scan-vs-cgms-sim.html#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Columbia Analytical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caslab.com/News/?p=8#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Yes, certified standards are used to plot calibration curves prior to quantitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, certified standards are used to plot calibration curves prior to quantitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Vivek Dhole</title>
		<link>http://www.caslab.com/News/gcms-full-scan-vs-cgms-sim.html#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Vivek Dhole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caslab.com/News/?p=8#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Generally for the quantification in GC-MS, "SIM mode" is prefered compared to "SCAN mode". Further do we also need to use standards of known concentrations for quantification? as we use in case of GC for quantification. Kindly explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally for the quantification in GC-MS, &#8220;SIM mode&#8221; is prefered compared to &#8220;SCAN mode&#8221;. Further do we also need to use standards of known concentrations for quantification? as we use in case of GC for quantification. Kindly explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.caslab.com/News/gcms-full-scan-vs-cgms-sim.html#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>david henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 15:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caslab.com/News/?p=8#comment-157</guid>
		<description>This explanation of SIM vs SCAN is misleading in the reasons why SIM has a better S/N ratio. When using SCAN mode, one can use software to filter out all the unwanted ions. Thus this filtering effect is not the reason for enhanced sensitivity.

The actual reason relates to the time spent monitoring the ions of interest in the two modes. A SCAN mode spectrum typically requires about 1 second to obtain. If one scans from 50-550 M/z, then the dwell time on one mass is about 2 ms. One is monitoring each ion of interest for only 0.2% of the total scan time and data points are spaced at 1 second intervals.

In SIM mode, the fact that you spend the entire time monitoring only the ions of interest means you have longer time to accumulate data for those ions and hence get a larger signal. At the same time, the longer monitoring time provided more opportunity for noise to cancel. The S/N improvement should be related to the relative time spent integrating each ion.

Another problem in fast GC-MS analysis is that peaks are often only a few seconds wide. One needs at least 8 data points to accurately define a gaussian peak. Thus a SIM mode scan can be set up to acquire more data points across a peak and provide a more accurate profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This explanation of SIM vs SCAN is misleading in the reasons why SIM has a better S/N ratio. When using SCAN mode, one can use software to filter out all the unwanted ions. Thus this filtering effect is not the reason for enhanced sensitivity.</p>
<p>The actual reason relates to the time spent monitoring the ions of interest in the two modes. A SCAN mode spectrum typically requires about 1 second to obtain. If one scans from 50-550 M/z, then the dwell time on one mass is about 2 ms. One is monitoring each ion of interest for only 0.2% of the total scan time and data points are spaced at 1 second intervals.</p>
<p>In SIM mode, the fact that you spend the entire time monitoring only the ions of interest means you have longer time to accumulate data for those ions and hence get a larger signal. At the same time, the longer monitoring time provided more opportunity for noise to cancel. The S/N improvement should be related to the relative time spent integrating each ion.</p>
<p>Another problem in fast GC-MS analysis is that peaks are often only a few seconds wide. One needs at least 8 data points to accurately define a gaussian peak. Thus a SIM mode scan can be set up to acquire more data points across a peak and provide a more accurate profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayesh darji</title>
		<link>http://www.caslab.com/News/gcms-full-scan-vs-cgms-sim.html#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>jayesh darji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caslab.com/News/?p=8#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee O'Neill, Columbia Analytical</title>
		<link>http://www.caslab.com/News/gcms-full-scan-vs-cgms-sim.html#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee O'Neill, Columbia Analytical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caslab.com/News/?p=8#comment-89</guid>
		<description>We can run dichlorobenzene by EPA Method 624, 524, 8260 or 8270, SIM or full scan. We have never run dimethylcarbamoyl chloride. Let us know if you have any further questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can run dichlorobenzene by EPA Method 624, 524, 8260 or 8270, SIM or full scan. We have never run dimethylcarbamoyl chloride. Let us know if you have any further questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayesh darji</title>
		<link>http://www.caslab.com/News/gcms-full-scan-vs-cgms-sim.html#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>jayesh darji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caslab.com/News/?p=8#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Pl provide method of analysis of O-dichlorobenzene &#38; Dimethylcarbamoyl chloride by GC/MS-SIM if, possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pl provide method of analysis of O-dichlorobenzene &amp; Dimethylcarbamoyl chloride by GC/MS-SIM if, possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
